Sierra Leone Telegraph: 11 June 2016
Sierra Leone is now in the middle of the rainy season, when water should not be a problem. But in the last six months, the shortage of clean drinking water in most parts of the country, except the president’s hometown of Makeni in the north – which is enjoying abundant access to electricity and water, is now becoming a national crisis.
Most communities in the capital Freetown are without pipe-borne water, let alone electricity. The government appears helpless and uncertain as to how to solve the problem, before it becomes a massive public health disaster.
The UK government has recently provided the Koroma government with a $45 million donor funds to help tackle the problem.
But Sierra Leone has no business being short of water. The country has one of the wettest rainy seasons in Africa. So whats gone wrong?
After decades of under-investment, mismanagement and corruption, the capital’s main source of water – the Guma Dam is drying out, with almost two million people struggling to cope.
It is important to note that president Koroma was the chairman of the Guma Water Company under the previous SLPP government, before becoming head of state in 2007. But it seems nothing was learnt during his stewardship. (Photo: The danger of inadequate water supply, poor sanitation and overcrowding in Freetown).
To compound the problem of inadequate water supply, Sierra Leone’s capital has been described as one of the filthiest capitals in the world. As a result, few tourists are venturing to visit the country.
The risk of cholera, typhoid and other dangerous water-borne diseases in Sierra Leone, are extremely high especially in the rainy season, when flooding and poor sanitation converge.
Poor sanitation was a major factor in the spread of the Ebola virus which took the lives of over 4,000 people in Sierra Leone.
Over 80% of people in Sierra Leone are without proper toilet facility. But the Koroma government says that building a new international airport, costing over $400 million with a loan from China is the country’s most pressing need.
Several other African countries are facing serious sanitation and water problems due to negligence, poor governance and lack of investment.
Writing for theconversation.com, Corah Walker and Carolyn Logan take a look at the problem and what needs to be done. This is what they say:
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal of ensuring access to clean water and sanitation for all by 2030 is an ambitious target for Africa.
According to new research by non-partisan research network Afrobarometer, nearly half of Africans don’t have access to clean water and two-thirds lack access to sewage infrastructure.
Improvements in both of these areas have been made in the past decade, but huge numbers of Africans still live without these basic necessities.
The lack of access to water and sanitation has not gone unnoticed by people living in Africa. Almost half of the continent’s citizens are not happy with the way their governments are handling water and sanitation.
The global Millennium Development Goals’ target for drinking water was met in 2010. About 2.6 billion people have gained access to improved sources of drinking water since 1990.
Five developing regions met the drinking water target, but the Caucasus and Central Asia, Northern Africa, Oceania and sub-Saharan Africa did not. In the area of sanitation, the target was missed by nearly 700 million people.
The only developing regions to meet the sanitation target were the Caucasus and Central Asia, Eastern Asia, Northern Africa and Western Asia.
Lack of access to water and sanitation is a matter of life and death. Contaminated water and inadequate sanitation help transmit diseases like diarrhoea, cholera, dysentery and typhoid.
In Africa, more than 315,000 children die every year from diarrhoeal diseases caused by unsafe water and poor sanitation. Globally, deaths from diarrhoea caused by unclean drinking water are estimated at 502,000 each year, most of them of young children.
The situation on the ground
To assess the situation on the ground, the research looked at 36 African countries in 2014/2015 and asked nearly 54,000 citizens about their access to water and sanitation. This was in addition to recording direct observations in the thousands of surveyed communities.
We found that almost half (45%) of Africans went without enough clean water for home use during the past year, while one in five (19%) did so many times or always. One-third of surveyed communities (36%) lacked access to a piped-water system, and two-thirds (68%) lacked access to sewage infrastructure.
The infrastructure situation has improved somewhat over the past decade. Across 18 countries that Afrobarometer has tracked since 2005, the share of communities enjoying piped-water supplies increased by 14 percentage points, and sewerage has been extended to an additional 8% of communities.
Even for those who live in zones with the necessary infrastructure, however, access to clean water and toilets is often difficult. More than half (51%) of those surveyed said they had to leave their compound to access water.
One in five had to leave their compound to use a latrine, and another 8% had no access at all to a latrine or toilet, even outside their compound.
Rural residents are far worse off than their urban counterparts when it comes to access to water and sanitation. Two-thirds (66%) of rural respondents had to go outside their compound to access water, compared with 30% of urbanites.
About 27% had to go outside the compound for a toilet and 11% had no access at all to a toilet. This is compared with 12% in urban areas, where just 3% had no access to toilet facilities.
Experiences vary widely across countries. Almost 74% of citizens in Gabon and 72% in Liberia reported going without enough water at least occasionally, compared with 8% in Mauritius and 15% in Cape Verde.
Going without enough water many times or always affected more than one-third of citizens in Madagascar (42%), Gabon (39%), Guinea (38%) and Togo (37%).
By region, Central Africa had the highest proportion of respondents who said they went without enough water at least once (55%), while North Africa recorded the lowest (33%).
Rural residents were more likely than their urban counterparts to experience water scarcity (50% vs 39%).
Where water ranks as a priority
Water supply ranked fifth in importance across 36 countries when citizens were asked about the most important problems facing their country. It followed unemployment, health, education and infrastructure/transport.
But it was well ahead of concerns about political violence, corruption, electricity, crime and security, and agriculture. And water supply was the top problem identified in water-poor countries like Burkina Faso, Guinea and Niger.
On average, a majority (55%) of citizens rated their government’s performance in handling water and sanitation services as fairly bad or very bad.
These negative appraisals were the majority view in all regions except North Africa, but even there, 46% rated their government’s handling of water and sanitation services as bad.
And public dissatisfaction is increasing. Across the 18 countries that Afrobarometer has tracked over the past decade, negative public ratings of government performance in providing water and sanitation services increased from 41% in 2005/2006 to 55% in 2014/2015.
They worsened dramatically in Madagascar, where there was an increase of 47 percentage points in fairly/very bad ratings, followed by Ghana (28-point increase in negative ratings), Senegal (23 points), Botswana (16 points), Mali (15 points) and South Africa (13 points).
These declining performance ratings should be a red flag for democratic governments that are still unable to provide their citizens with these most basic services. Safe and readily available water is a human right and an important contributor to public health.
Improved access to safe water and sanitation boosts economic growth, contributes to poverty reduction, and is fundamental to achieving the goals of improved health and education, greater food security, and improved environmental sustainability.
So modest improvements in coverage of water supply and sewerage systems are set alongside significant declines in government performance ratings.
Perhaps this seeming incongruity indicates that citizens’ expectations about the quality of infrastructure and services that they should receive (or even demand) from their governments are rising.
Other questions still require further exploration, for example the question of whether progress can best be realised through local control and/or nongovernmental organisations or foreign investment, or whether centralised government investment, management and control of water infrastructure is the better approach.
About the Authors:
Corah Walker is a PhD Student in the Department of Political Science, Michigan State University
Carolyn Logan is Deputy Director of the Afrobarometer & Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science and MSU’s African Studies Center, Michigan State University
I give the president credit for bringing development to Makeni his home town which is the district headquarter of the north. The only thing he needs to embark on now is to use his popularity to convince most of the northerners to relocate back to the north. The war is long over, instead of overpopulating Freetown.
There are lots of opportunities in that region with regard to agriculture, mining, business and education which they can continue to build on, instead of living in the slums of Freetown in inhumane conditions. I believe most of these people are very industrious.
But by staying in that quagmire in Freetown, they are limiting their potential. Some of them believe that becoming a petty trader is better than education. So they introduced these smart young kids to petty trading and some as team of beggars, which is an eye sore in our capital.
Makeni now enjoys 24 hours light, clean pipe-borne water supplies, good roads, good schools and a university which proves that the president is showing where his priority is, because “charity begins at home”.
Probably the APC have a political advantage (voters) by maintaining the status quo in Freetown, because an educated population can have more choices and will be difficult to be brainwashed.
Instead of using Makeni as a weekend resort, it should be considered a residential alternative to Freetown. This can restore both cities to their past glory.