President Koroma’s sacking of vice president Sam Sumana was illegal – says Ecowas Court

Sierra Leone Telegraph: 27 November 2017

Reports from Abuja, Nigeria, says that the West African Regional Court of Justice – the ECOWAS Court, has today ruled that president Koroma’s sacking of the country’s vice president Sam Sumana in 2015, after accusing Sam Sumana of “abandoning” his duties by seeking political asylum in the US embassy, was illegal. Koroma must now pay restitution damages.

This court ruling comes against the earlier decision of the Sierra Leone Supreme Court Judges, who said that president koroma as Supreme ruler of Sierra Leone, has the right to sack the vice president.

But the ECOWAS Court of Justice disagrees, and has ordered the government of Sierra Leone to pay the former vice president Sam Sumana his full salary along with other emoluments lost since his dismissal in 2015.

Sam Sumana’s lawyers had told the Court that their client should receive damages in the sum of $250 million (about £190 million), for the hurt caused to his person and financial loss suffered as a result of president Koroma’s unconstitutional decision to kick him out of office without proper due process.

It is unlikely the Court could have ruled for cash-strapped Sierra Leone taxpayers to pay this amount, which is almost as much as the country receives in foreign aid. And to do so would have been regarded as a punishment of the people of Sierra Leone, for the sins of their president.

But by failing to attend the ECOWAS Court proceedings and make representation to defend the decision of president Koroma to sack the vice president, critics say that the Koroma government deliberately shot itself in the foot.

But will the Koroma government pay financial compensation as ruled by the ECOWAS Court? Presidential and general elections will be held in Sierra Leone in March next year. President Koroma will not be contesting those elections as his term of office ends in November 2018.

It is highly unlikely that the incoming government will be in any rush to find money to pay Sam Sumana’s lost salary and benefits.

However, Sam Sumana will be exploiting today’s Court ruling to his political advantage, as he joins the election campaign along the opposition parties to unseat the ruling APC.

Responding to the news of victory this morning, Sam Sumana is understood to have told journalists that “the ECOWAS Court’s decision is not just for him but for the people of Sierra Leone, Africa and the whole world at large”.

Listen here to Sam Sumana speaking to BBC Focus On Africa this afternoon after the verdict:

And this is what Sierra Leone’s Attorney General – Joseph Kamara told the BBC Focus on Africa in Response:

The Sierra Leone Telegraph this afternoon contacted the Attorney General of Sierra Leone for his response to today’s ECOWAS Court decision and received this statement:

Can the ECOWAS Court over-turn the decision of Sierra Leone’s Supreme Court?

The Community Court of Justice was created pursuant to the provisions of Articles 6 and 15 of the Revised Treaty of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).

Its Organisational framework, functioning mechanism, powers, and procedure applicable before it are set out in Protocol A/P1/7/91 of 6 July 1991, Supplementary Protocol A/SP.1/01/05 of 19 January 2005, Supplementary Protocol A/SP.2/06/06 of 14 June 2006, Regulation of 3 June 2002, and Supplementary Regulation C/REG.2/06/06 of 13 June 2006.

COMPOSITION and MANDATE 

The Court is composed of seven (7) independent Judges who are persons of high moral character, appointed by the Authority of Heads of State of Government, from nationals of Member States, for a four-year term of office, upon recommendation of the Community Judicial council.

The Mandate of the Court is to ensure the observance of law and of the principles of equity and in the interpretation and application of the provisions of the Revised Treat and all other subsidiary legal instruments adopted by Community.

JURISDICTION

Advisory Jurisdiction – The Court gives legal advisory opinion on any matter that requires interpretation of the Community text.

Contentious Jurisdiction

  • The Court examines cases of failure by Member States to honour their obligations under the Community law;
  • The Court has competence to adjudicate on any dispute relating to the interpretation and application of acts of the Community;
  • The Court adjudicates in disputes between Institutions of the Community and their officials;
  • The Court has power to handle cases dealing with liability for or against the Community;
  • The Court has jurisdiction to determine cases of violation of human rights that occur in any Member State;
  • The Court adjudges and makes declarations on the legality of Regulations, Directives, Decisions, and other subsidiary legal instruments adopted by ECOWAS.

Competence in matters of arbitration

Pending the establishment of an Arbitration tribunal, provided for under Article 16 of the Revised Treaty, the Court has competence to act as Arbitration.

WHO IS ENTITLED TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE COURT?

Access to the Court is open to the following:

  • All Member States and the Commission, for actions brought for failure by Member States to fulfil their obligations;
  • Member States, the Council of Ministers and the Commission, for determination of the legality of an action in relation to any Community text.
  • Individuals and corporate bodies, for any act of the Community which violates the rights of such individuals or corporate bodies;
  • Staff of any of the ECOWAS Institutions;
  • Persons who are victims of human rights violation occurring in any Member State;
  • National courts or parties to a case, when such national courts or parties request that the ECOWAS Court interprets, on preliminary grounds, the meaning of any legal instrument of the Community;
  • The Authority of Heads of State and Government, when bringing cases before the Court on issues other than those cited above.

HOW TO ACCESS THE COURT?

Cases are filed before the Court through written applications addressed to the registry. Such applications must indicate the name of the applicant, the party against whom the proceedings are being instituted, a brief statement of the facts of the case, and the orders being sought by the plaintiff.

APPLICABLE LAW and DECISIONS OF THE COURT

The Court applies the Treaty, the Conventions, Protocols and Regulations adopted by the Community and the general principles of law as set out in Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice.
In the area of human rights protection, the Court equally applies, inter alia, international instruments relating to human rights and ratified by the State or States party to the case.

Decisions of the Court are not subject to appeal, except in cases of application for revision by the Court; decisions of the Court may also come under objection from third parties.

Decisions of the Court are binding and each Member State shall indicate the competent national authority responsible for the enforcement of decisions of the Court.

11 Comments

  1. I was fortunate to listen to Mr Sam Sumana speaking live to an audience in Maryland. The first time was 2011 before our 50th independence anniversary when he was our Vice President; and all I heard from him then was shout and praises to his ALMIGHTY EARNEST KOROMA and earlier this month I heard him not only destroying the image of his Almighty Earnest but had the guts to lie about the role he played toward Muslims by stating that he bought buses and ambulances for Sierra Leonean pilgrims and was about to purchase a house that will accommodate pilgrims in Saudi Arabia before he was fired.

    I always believe that he was well acquainted with the APC doctrine of destruction which he signed up for after what happened with the late VP SI Koroma and FM Minah. Going to the Ecowas court as a cry baby primarily to get more money from the people of Sierra Leone after he and President Koroma have stolen millions from us is considered unpatriotic after you have sworn to respect and uphold the constitution of our nation during the inauguration.

    Mr Sam Sumana knows that he abandoned his post for the US embassy based on fear for his life, and he should have shown respect for the courts decision and move on to enjoy his loot. The APC has always been a secret society and now he has exposed the whole country to ridicule by the Ecowas decision which I believe was just a copy cat of the incident in Zimbabwe just to prove that Ecowas is also effective in upholding democracy.

    In my opinion, your usefulness was overdue for the President and he needed to replace you with Victor Foh who was smart enough to pledge his total loyalty to the president instead of his nation from the example he learnt from SI Koroma – just as Sylvia Blyden who was also used by the president to destroy Victor Foh’s integrity through the ” Hajjgate” in order to handpick his Bombali brother (Samura Kamara). For the APC “the end always justify the means”.

  2. My comment is to refer all and sundry to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) Report on Sierra Leone, and what that report says about the justice system in the country vis-a-vis causes of the 10-year civil war.

  3. Am really happy about the judicial ruling by ECOWAS and I hope this political interference and corruption will end in Sierra Leone.

  4. No the ecowas court has told the world that the judicial system in Sierra Leone is full of political interference and corruption.

  5. I dont know where people got this $250 million dollars as compensation from which is part of the lies to distract us.The amount according to his lawyers is $10 million dollars in costs. This case is not about money but justice.

    “In all circumstances, it is always required that the law should be allowed to run its course.

    “The exercise of power should be circumscribed with the requirements of due process and this has not been satisfied in this particular case.” (Ecowas Court Judgement 27/11/2017)

  6. Majority of us knew that the removal of the former Vice President was illegal and done in a manner that was completely unnecessary; laying a precedent that will haunt our political dispensation in years to come. We were however let down by our judges whose interpretation, had it been done with justice could have restored dignity in our judicial system but instead were blinded with material wealth. May God punish them.

    I found it bizarre that this government could be as reckless as they are, not to send representatives to the Ecowas court. And how can we criticise the amount involved when this could have been argued and negotiated to a reasonable amount. The issue of jurisdiction could also have been argued in court.

    The attorney general had the temerity to write this letter that I find legally deficient and politically stupid. But what will you expect when you have a President and Government with no respect for the rule of law and no democratic values. What a shame.

  7. Hello good evening. I am Alfred Turay. I want to congratulate the ECOWAS COURT for this judgement. For me the judgement is fair. Let justice prevails.

  8. I personally believe that it’s a moral victory for Mr Sam Sumana but also a personal victory for the president since he got away with his agenda to handpick his candidate,and he personally does not have to pay any punitive damages to Mr Sam Sumana.

    Unfortunately the country has to pay the current Vice President and Mr Sam Sumana after APC losing the upcoming election. This will be unfair and unnecessary burden on the tax payers.

  9. Good evening, am writing from Germany, married to a Sierra Leonean woman and am a friend of your wonderful country. In my eyes the decision of the ecowas court is ridiculous. I know the big poverty of many sierra leoneans, the high rate of unemployment special of the youth.

    How you will explain to the majority of Sierra Leonean people that a man like Sumana should get a compensation of 250 million dollars?

    Did he suffer so much? or he was so busy like Bill Gates? Nobody in the whole world is worth to get this money within some years; either he is a mafia boss, a corrupt criminal or another shameful exploiter.

    • It was a symbolic sum that should not be taken literally. He never wanted to claim that money from the government, but his RIGHT. He got his right and he is satisfied with it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*