WHO and WFP  unite to gain zero Ebola cases as Koroma retreats to fight personal political battle

Sierra Leone Telegraph: 11 March 2015

president koroma washes hands at lungi airport 2015As the number of people contracting the Ebola virus and dying from the disease continue to rise in Sierra Leone, in Liberia fingers are crossed the country has turned the corner, as they celebrate zero cases in the last few weeks. (Photo: Koroma washes hands to fight a new political battle).

In neighbouring Sierra Leone, which now has the highest number of Ebola victims in the West African region, scientists and medical experts are puzzled as to why Ebola remains doggedly entrenched in the capital Freetown and three of the ruling APC party’s heartlands – Bombali, Port Loko and Kambia.

Instead of focusing on bringing Ebola to an end in Sierra Leone, president Koroma and senior members of his ruling party have spent an inordinate amount of time and energy, waging war on those in their party with whom they disagree.

This dangerous diversion of purpose and political instability engineered at State House, has increased the risk of Ebola returning to the whole country once again.

Bombali is president Koroma’s home district. Port Loko is home to the information minister – Kanu, yet neither of the two most senior politicians in the country has been able to emulate the success of the Southern districts, in bringing Ebola to an end in their respective hometowns.

WHO and WFP have now seized the initiative. They have formed a new partnership to take the fight to those communities where Ebola remains undefeated.

At the height of the Ebola crisis – last year, president Koroma visited each of the districts, where he laid down very sternly, the consequences of residents in those communities failing to observe the Ebola restrictions.

palo conteh and president koromaThe president threatened to impose tough sanctions, including jail sentence for any local chief that failed to bring Ebola to an end in their district.

In Bombali, a local chief believed to be his uncle, was fined for failing to implement the restrictions.

But four months on, what is clear is that local communities and their chiefs in the Southern districts have shown exemplary conduct in bringing Ebola to an end in their respective districts, most of which have gone for more than 42 days without a single case of Ebola.

So why are the northern hometowns of the president, his gullible information minister and other senior ministers, continuing to report new cases of Ebola every single day, since Pujehun in the south registered zero cases over three and a half months ago?

The northern districts have had more resources poured into their communities than the south, despite the southern districts at the early stages of the crisis, recording the highest number of new cases and deaths.

President Koroma greeted by Traditional LeadersIs president Koroma refusing to get tough with the northern districts for political and family reasons, or is it incompetence on the part of those managing the crisis in those districts?

The report into the misappropriation of the Ebola funds, published by the Audit office last month, shows massive sums of money unaccounted for in the northern districts, yet with little or no repercussions.

The impact of this disgraceful theft of Ebola funds on the fight against the virus in the north is now evidently clear, as the number of new cases and deaths continues to rise in those communities.

Tonight, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP), have announced a renewed joint effort to achieve zero cases in the three affected countries – especially Sierra Leone, as president Koroma drops the leadership baton to fight personal political battle in his party.

This new partnership arrangement will combine the logistics strength of WFP with WHO’s public health expertise to get the job done, as the number of new cases keeps rising in Sierra Leone.

SWITZERLAND-HEALTH-FLU-WHO-PANDEMIC-CHAN “This partnership increases both agencies’ abilities to reach, monitor and respond to the needs of all people touched by Ebola,” says Dr Margaret Chan, WHO Director-General.

“It helps us deploy and maintain technical teams with expertise in infection prevention and control, epidemiology, and contact tracing, enabling dedicated health workers in the deep field to do their best work. The partnership is also a learning opportunity for the future, informing our capacities to launch joint operations during large scale emergencies,” Dr. Chan told the media.

WFP Executive Director – Ertharin Cousin says that; “Over the past seven months, partnerships have been crucial in fighting this devastating outbreak. WFP has worked with our partners to respond to communities’ most basic needs — making sure food is reaching everywhere that the Ebola virus has hit. Our logistical support to WHO and the wider humanitarian community has enabled affected people to receive the urgent care and support they need.”

“We are making progress, however we must remain vigilant. The Ebola crisis will not end until we identify, reach and successfully treat every last case. Recognizing this goal, the WHO-WFP partnership – a joint technical and operational force – will continue providing the support required to achieve zero cases.”

Using a joint operations approach, the two agencies agreed to combine their expertise in more than 60 priority districts and prefectures on the ground in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, the three most Ebola-affected countries.

Today, more WHO employees are working at the community level on Ebola in West Africa than at any other point in the epidemic.

Ebola lockdown2Over 700 people are currently deployed in the Ebola affected countries.

In districts with ongoing Ebola transmission, WFP is ensuring that WHO disease detectives have the resources they need — computer equipment, phones and stable internet connectivity — to share information critical to tracking and stopping the virus.

WFP is also managing the fleet of rugged vehicles carrying WHO social anthropologists and epidemiologists to isolated villages, where they will continue gaining the trust of communities to find and follow contacts of Ebola patients until all cases are resolved.

The joint partnership responds to the directive of WHO’s Executive Board Special Session on Ebola, to develop new ways to strengthen health emergency operations and provides a model for collaboration in future response to emergencies with health impact.


  1. What a sad, sad state of affairs. What did the people of Sierra Leone who have suffered so much do to deserve Ernest Koroma as a President? Have they not suffered enough?

    New allegations about misappropriation and theft of millions of dollars in funds donated by the Saudi government, for the rehabilitation of Fourah Bay College have surfaced.

    The funds were donated well over 3 years ago. Ernest Koroma appointed his brother as architect “consultant” to the project, and not a single brick has been laid in the three years since the first tranche of funds was received.

    Procurement protocols were not followed. How can the leadership of Sierra Leone justify this?

    How can a leader steal from ordinary students trying to get an education under extremely difficult circumstances while his own children are being educated abroad?

    The raping and pillaging of the people of Sierra Leone continues while the international community sits idly by.

    The people of Sierra Leone cannot and should no longer stand for this and the international community must step in with sanctions and travel bans for the leadership. Sierra Leone must be kicked out of the AGOA Forum and similar bodies until some semblance of sanity returns.

    International investors being fully aware of the extent of the corruption and depravity must keep their distance. They cannot operate in Sierra Leone today without greasing palms, making large facilitation payments and risking investigation by international regulators.

    The risk of reputational damage and monetary sanctions by regulators is too high. There are other better governed jurisdictions seeking foreign direct investment. The potential downside is too great and the upside, very limited.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.